The bar chart illustrates the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese between 1965 to 2015, while the pie chart demonstrates the part of adults who were overweight, obese, severely obese, and healthy or underweight in 2015.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese between 1965 to 2015, while the pie chart demonstrates the part of adults who were overweight, obese, severely obese, and healthy or underweight in 2015.
Overall, the percentage of adults who were overweight and obese increased steadily from 1965 to 2015, also in 2015 most adult population are overweight and obese.
As it shown there are two significant rise in the number of adults who were overweight or obese. The first one occurred between 1985 to 1995 it was around 12%, which mean that in 1985 they were about 50% but in 1995 they grew to 60%. And the second one is between 1995 to 2015 it was about 20%, the percentage of 2015 is just under 80%.
The pie chart has 4 different categories which is about 30% for each one except one of them that was stand for severely obese. The adults who were dangerously fat account for 6% of the whole population. Overweight and obese people are between 31 to 35 and healthy or under weight adults are 29%.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010 78
- Task 2 Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
... As it shown there are two significant rise in the number of adults who were overwe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'rise' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'rises'.
Suggestion: rises
... As it shown there are two significant rise in the number of adults who were overwe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63243243243 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46642909115 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491891891892 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5046050399 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.632644296526 0.215688989381 293% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283776523319 0.103423049105 274% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.25438655 0.0843802449381 301% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.45492708857 0.15604864568 292% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.259634712581 0.0819641961636 317% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.