Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
There is an ongoing debate that it is not good to discuss to discuss controversial views with those having contrasting viewpoints as very small number of people are ready to change their decisions. Many people are dogmatic about their views and stay unyielding on their mind sets. However, many individuals believe that there should be change for the betterment of the society. I strongly agree with the former point as only few people change their minds rest all stay on their viewpoint due to ensure their dominance in the society.
Although it is true that change is necessary for the success of any place and human being and change brings with it new teaching, which may be good or bad, but many opinionated masses are in a view that change may affect their superiority among others. For instance, in any religion people are more asserted towards their scrupulous and do not want to change their thoughts and adopt any good deeds from other religion as it may diminish their dominance among the other religion. To elucidate, Hindus and Muslims never agree on their opinions and always tries to show their chauvinism. Hence, people are not flexible in changing their thoughts about others.
Perhaps, the most important reason for my support is that if these controversial views are discussed among the society members with constrained thoughts than it may lead sometime to hazardous effects which rather than supporting and helping results in decline and loss. To exemplify, according to a survey by an institution about 40% of the riots in history occurs because society members are forced to change their minds regarding various issues like woman empowerment and when they refused then it results in destruction and riots. Thus, people having contrasting views can make inappropriate use of controversial views.
There are some individuals in society that can support various points and adapt to change to receive various benefits in society, for instance, scientists can change various theories that may lead to further advancement in technology. In contrary, some individuals use these to have their own advantage. For example, if we encourage government to decrease the reserved seats then many students getting these seats may oppose the government to have their own advantage.
For all these reasons, I believe that controversial points are not useful to be putting against people having contrasting views because they may not be honoured by the individuals and some may misuse them for their own advantage.
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 58
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your 16
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed Instead they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and place of the offence To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 73
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 66
- We learn through direct experience to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to discuss'.
Suggestion: to discuss
...s an ongoing debate that it is not good to discuss to discuss controversial views with those having c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'discuss discussing'.
Suggestion: discuss discussing
...n ongoing debate that it is not good to discuss to discuss controversial views with those having c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changed'?
Suggestion: changed
...ndividuals believe that there should be change for the betterment of the society. I st...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16097560976 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65811587631 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480487804878 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5198839317 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.066666667 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348388453129 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13839148267 0.0831039109588 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799464970715 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206420470793 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107459716914 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.