Information is the driving force that perpetuates knowledge. A fact presented as a piece of information may well be factitious or veracious in the long run. I mostly disagree with the prompt that states that facts be dismissed since they would be found specious in the future.
Facts are stepping stones on which many scientific experiments are built and new inventions made. Creative minds employ facts as one of the rudiments in the early stages of their inventions; invention is a painstaking process that manifests as a continuous rise and fall to score an achievement. For instance, historical records show that the inventor of the light bulb was successful after the one hundred and first experiment. Most scientific experiments rely on facts at the initial stages of development and then modify these facts over time.
Au contraire, facts could hamper the progress of an already existing state. This is evident, most of the time, in the political atmospheric setting- such as in partisan politics, where an opposing party could, by the power of the media, release contentious and defamatory, yet seemingly credible content that could lead to an upheaval in the harmony of a state. Facts presented could cause a schism, diatribe, or even worse, riot when not verified.
In conclusion, although one should be wary of facts, especially as it pertains to politics and the media, facts are important in academia, as they could birth invention.
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate 33
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 83
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In d
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 237.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13924050633 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85451691843 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1608151664 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.727272727 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185141855938 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775446227262 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929344957362 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128716001342 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126999997001 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.