The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line graph compares the number of requests given to the Tourist Information Office in one city over a period of six months in 2011.
Overall, the number of inquiries in person and via telephone increased steadily, while the figure for inquiries by letter or email showed the opposite trend.
It can be easily seen that the office received the fewest inquiries in person in January. In-person inquiries experienced two periods of rising: the first rose slightly to 800 in March, and the second increased at a faster pace by adding 1000 in the next three months and ranking first. Telephone was the most popular method in January, with nearly 900 inquiries. After a slight drop, the figure bounced back to 1000 and increased to 1600, which ranked second in June.
By contrast, there was a downward trend in the number of requests that were made via letter or email, as the figure declined slightly from nearly 800 to 700 inquiries, plummeted to the lowest point over the period shown at under 400, and remained unchanged between May and June
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-04 | brew | 65 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | euphorianmt | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | leuleu28 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 84
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81666666667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38810710722 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2417795275 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.857142857 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255348947888 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125130405376 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197566326541 0.0843802449381 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199813630075 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.232791433837 0.0819641961636 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81666666667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38810710722 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2417795275 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.857142857 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255348947888 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125130405376 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197566326541 0.0843802449381 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199813630075 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.232791433837 0.0819641961636 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.