People think that the government should increase the cost cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
Opinion diverges whether it will be advantageous if the government nudges the cost of fuel for combustion engine vehicles to solve the environmental problems. Conversely, in my opinion, there are drawbacks that possibly cast the benefits if the argument is approved.
People argue that by increasing the cost for fuels, the environment will eventually be aided by the plunge of vehicles like car usage. The primary reason behind this is the high dependence of many industries like construction, hospitality and logistics on transportation services. Hence, the amount of carbon dioxide, which causes global warming as well as harms the human respiratory system, released by combustion engines will dip. Moreover, the personal car consumption is expected to fall off a cliff as the increased overhead cost can be overwhelming to them. Consequently, people can earn the habit of transitioning via public transportation, which is highly encouraged by many nations as a key driver to solve the environmental problems.
However, I oppose this proposal as its damage on facets of the society is outstanding compared to the benefits. Globalization, which creates high needs on transportation, has merged and become a must-have characteristic for countries, and companies to flourish. When the government nudges the fuel price, misery will come true to companies involved in shipping operations who are already bearing accumulative burdens in tariffs. Eventually, these companies will be forced to raise their service charges and people’s lives will be hit hard. For instance, when the higher expenses for a logistics chain of coffee beans in Vietnam is, the higher consumers have to pay in the purchasing section. As long as the price of products goes up, people will have to cut more slices of their remuneration to suffice the cost.
Moreover, many developing countries do not have public transportation services, so they will have no other choice but to bear the increasingly growing cost. Henceforth, their periodical bills will rise, resulting in more considerations for daily products like food or water. In some cases, these citizens have to choose the packed or processed meals, which are cheaper, to suffice the expense. By keeping this diet in the long term, these people will suffer from serious diseases like obesity, diabete.
To be concluded, though the increase in the cost of fuel can aid the environment’s betterment by lowering car usage and encouraging public transportation, it is entirely overshadowed by inevitable drawbacks on companies as well as citizen’s lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- People think that the government should increase the cost cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to solve the environmental problems. However, I oppose this proposal as its d...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41975308642 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15952531457 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572839506173 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8693932994 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.944444444 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254987269872 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775724415351 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872291006636 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158066856378 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704884971036 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.