The line graph compares the number of visitors to three museums in London, namely the British Museum, the Science Museum, and the Natural History Museum, from June to September in 2013.
Overall, the British Museum was the most popular museum among the three, while the Science Museum was the least popular. In the end of the summer, the number of visitors to the British Museum and the Science Museum went up, whereas the figure for the Natural History Museum showed an opposite trend.
In June 2013, there were 600,000 and 400,000 visitors to the British Museum and the Science Museum respectively. The number of visitors to the British Museum reached a peak of about 750,000 in July, compared to around 350,000 visitors to the Science Museum. The month of August witnessed a sudden decline in the number of visitors to both museums, with 500,000 visitors to the British Museum and 300,000 visitors to the Science Museum. After that, there was a dramatic increase in the figures for both museums by 150,000.
On the other hand, there was a significant decrease in the number of visitors to the Natural History Museum from about 550,000 in June to below 400,000 in July. The figure remained stable at around 400,000 in August before increasing remarkably to nearly 500,000 in September.
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 67
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 73
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 89
- The bar chart shows information about fiction book sales from 2006 to 2010 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97695852535 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32167526791 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.432445245 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326417783973 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172023034915 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124522325109 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247074103236 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131203168631 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.