Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Advances in science and technology has made major strides in deciphering the mysteries of the word, making us exposed to newer complexities, yet infinite possibilities. Some people believe that these discoveries are these discoveries are making us close to understanding the world around us, while others opine these advances are making people velnaruable to complexities; leading people entangled in the realm. While I agree that these advances have brought some negatives to the current world, I believe the benefits corresponding to the same strides can't be glossed over, which has been explained in the impending paragraphs.
Discoveries in the field of science, may it be geology, paleontology, astronomy or biology, had help us better understand about our origin, which not only gives people a sense of purpose in the world, but also aids in having a better grasp on our standing in the vast world of uncertainty. Taking as an example, Newton is often blamed for complicating the field of science, as his fundamental discovery of gravity, or his laws of motion. But, the same discoveries are the one that helps us understand the fundamental questions of out state. His discovery has made us answer the most trivial questions like; How is the Earth rotating around the Sun? How are we able to stand with out feets always touching the ground in the spherical planet of ours?,though still a matter of debate for the "flat-earthers", we still have these questions answered, often ingrained in our logic as "common sense", all thanks to a trifling theory proposed by Sir Issac Newton. The same is the case for the discoveries relating radioactivity, general relativity, or quantum mechanical, which we have the scientific luminaries to thank for
On the contrary, not all discoveries have made our life easier but rather entangled us in the web of confusion polarizing opinions left and right. Taking the discovery of radium as an example, at current the discovery of radioactivity by Madam Marie Curie had made added to our lives, as we are able to use their discovery form scanning tumor inside our bodies to even scanning picasso paintings for underlying images to validate its originality, but the same radioactive substance's exposure has given raise to the cataclysmic accident at Chernobyl, which the world hasn't yet recovered from. Robert Oppenheimer's atomic bom's repercussions has haunted generations in Hirosima and Nagasaki, so these problems are not the ones to look over.
There is no doubt that the problems faced by people at present can be attributed to the scientific advancements, which has made our live infinitely complex than we have ever realized, but in the same time it has made us understand our stance in this vast universe, which though sounds trifling is nothing to be looked over. Taking the route of optimism, I believe the benefits brought to the world outweighs any such complexities.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-16 | Dipesh1234 | 83 | view |
2023-02-19 | Yam Kumar Oli | 77 | view |
2022-11-25 | Rasika0511 | 66 | view |
2022-11-09 | Soumyadip Kar 1729 | 58 | view |
2022-08-10 | ManthanW | 50 | view |
- The knowledge of maths is not important for most jobs nowadays To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- With the increased global demand for oil and gas undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- In many countries people do not do enough to recycle their used materials glass paper metal What do you think are the reasons for this What do you think can be done to solve this problem 73
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 554, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...efits corresponding to the same strides cant be glossed over, which has been explain...
^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[3]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...paleontology, astronomy or biology, had help us better understand about our origin, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur origin, which not only gives people a sense of purpose in the world, but also ...
^^
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...round the Sun? How are we able to stand with out feets always touching the ground in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 750, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , though
... ground in the spherical planet of ours?,though still a matter of debate for the '...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'substances'' or 'substance's'?
Suggestion: substances'; substance's
...s originality, but the same radioactive substances exposure has given raise to the catacly...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... accident at Chernobyl, which the world hasnt yet recovered from. Robert Oppenheimers...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here is no doubt that the problems faced by people at present can be attributed t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, still, while, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2469.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17610062893 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10444736622 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519916142558 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.363035751 60.3974514979 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.923076923 118.986275619 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6923076923 23.4991977007 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349856648212 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123028169107 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080716084391 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215377601253 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673990362264 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 14.1392134831 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 48.8420337079 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.