he graph below gives information about the percentage of the population
in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for
2030 and 2040.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant
The line chart shows the urban population shares in four countries in Southeast Asia from 1970 to 2020, with projections to 2040.
When discussing Malaysia, it can be observed that approximately one-third of the population resided in urban areas in the first year. It is expected that this proportion will continue to steadily increase to over 80% by 2040, which is significantly higher than any other country listed. As for Indonesia, although the urban population rate is much lower, or it can be said to be the lowest in the table (about 15%), it also exhibits a steady increasing trend similar to Malaysia. At the same time, the population rate is very low. The country’s urban population has also significantly increased compared to the beginning, surpassing Thailand in 2000 and the Philippines in 2010 to become the country with the second-highest urban population ratio. It is forecasted to reach just above 60% in the final year.
Turning to Thailand and the Philippines, the proportion of urban population in the Philippines is initially the highest, at a little over 30%. After being overtaken by Malaysia in its early years, the Philippines saw an increase in its urban population by almost half and regained its dominance in 1990. However, this dominance only lasted for a while. In a short period of time, the country’s market share gradually decreased to about 41% in 2010 and is then predicted to increase by about 10% by 2040. Thailand also follows a similar pattern but ranks last from 2000 onwards. This number starts at almost one-fifth (roughly 20%) of the city’s population before being estimated to more than double by the end of 2040.
Overall, the population living in cities in all countries surveyed is expected to increase, with Malaysia dominating the rankings for the most part. Indonesia is predicted to overtake Thailand and the Philippines to hold the second place in the final half of the timeline.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how famlilies in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative situation 67
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nce only lasted for a while. In a short period of time, the country’s market share gradually d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 965.302439024 168% => OK
No of words: 322.0 196.424390244 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03105590062 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85139172732 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518633540373 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 283.868780488 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4289169815 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183350522831 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645131312362 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592128095478 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143325293306 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489867538315 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nce only lasted for a while. In a short period of time, the country’s market share gradually d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 965.302439024 168% => OK
No of words: 322.0 196.424390244 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03105590062 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85139172732 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518633540373 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 283.868780488 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4289169815 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183350522831 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645131312362 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592128095478 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143325293306 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489867538315 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.