More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news. They get news about the world through the internet. Is this a positive or negative development?
In today’s digital age, people tend to increasingly get news through Internet instead of newspapers or TV channels. While I accept that using Internet-connected devices to read news can bring people several benefits, it still is considered a negative development for numerous reasons.
On the one hand, geting news through Internets can offer people convenient experiences and save money. Initially, people can easy to stay update with current news and affairs all over the world with a tap on the screen, whenever and wherever they want. It is more convenient than other ways as its flexibility, instead of information are just printed on newspapers or on air in TV in particular time in a day. Moreover, people can also save money, especially who are budget-conscious, by reading news from Internet. For instance, instead of paying money for newspapers everydays, people can read them free when accessing to Wifi or any Internet devices.
On the other hand, Internet also provide several demerits when people use it to get news. Firtsly, in today’s digitial age, increasingly unverified information appears, making people misunderstand about something. If people do not have ability of gathering information, they can easy to get the wrong news, affecting their informed decisions. Unlike online news, newspapers and TV programs are more likely trustful as all the sources of information are checked by goverment. Moreover, the tendency of reading news through Internet can make printed news decrease in the amount of production or perhaps cannot maintain in the future, offering disadvantage for older people who are not excel in technology.
In conclusion, Internet can help people stay up-to-date with current affairs across the world in a very convenient way; however, it also offer people several drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-17 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | Kha Linh | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Giang Tran | 70 | view |
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 56
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 84
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 460, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... people can also save money, especially who are budget-conscious, by reading news from ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cannot maintain in the future, offering disadvantage for older people who are no...
^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'excelled'.
Suggestion: excelled
...sadvantage for older people who are not excel in technology. In conclusion, Interne...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'offers'?
Suggestion: offers
...a very convenient way; however, it also offer people several drawbacks.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37762237762 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00060306586 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1527520449 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.307692308 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38826338623 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149963110065 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616674341847 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245556903785 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101430439402 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.