Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems. What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them?
In recent days, it becomes common when cyclists and car drivers go in the same line. While this phenomenal results in several challenges, I believe that with potential solutions, this problems can be mitigated.
This trend can result in a lot of traffic issues. To commence with, the major challenge is likelihood of people’s safety. Due to the differing speeds of two types of transportation, accidents can occure. Car drivers, sometimes unware of cylists nearby, may unintentionally cause collisions, leading to injures or worses as cyclists are not mandatory to wear helmets. Furthermore, traffic congestion is another problem that arises from this shared road usage. The lower speed of cyclists can impede the flow of traffic, especially during peak hours. This can either frustrate car drivers or affect overall traffic efficient.
To minimize these problems, a lot of measures should be taken. First of all, government should improve infractructure which provides ample space for each model of transportation on their own lane. Not only that, government should also implement strict regulations to ban car drivers who deliberately go on the road aimed for cyclist and vice versa. In addition, education and public campaigns should be organized to raise the awareness of citizens about the needs and dangers of shared road usage. For example, these campaigns can be arranged in schools or announced over a loudspeaker, a place where can get the attention of many people.
In conclusion, it is true that the phenomenal of using same road for bike cycles and cars can results in numerous serios probems. However, these challenges can be mitigated with the collaboration of government and citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-15 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | bibiane chou | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Đặng Luân | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | minayoung | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below
- The picture below shows a hot balloon works The picture below shows a hot balloon works Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 56
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main energy source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power or wind power To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... believe that with potential solutions, this problems can be mitigated. This tre...
^^^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'injure'.
Suggestion: injure
...entionally cause collisions, leading to injures or worses as cyclists are not mandatory...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33210332103 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93584122228 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627306273063 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2609471556 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275329758614 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821450743227 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467767500025 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166939984209 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291233116921 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.