The given pie charts illustrate data about the percentages of expenditure of individuals on six different categories.
Overall, proportionally, the amount of money spent on housing, luxury items, and food were likely to show a remarkable rise, while those of the rest encountered a decrease of varying degrees, with the most pronounced decline being seen in the figure for food. It is also reported that housing ended up as the most dominant expense.
Looking first at the statistics of the housing and luxury goods, the former commenced the period at 22%, which was three times higher than the corresponding figure for the later, at only 7%. Thereafter, there was a substantial rise of about 10% in the former after a 20-year period, making it finish as the highest ranking. A similar change, but to a lesser extent, can be observed in the latter, skyrocketing to 17% by the end of the period. Moreover, 8% was witnessed in the percentage of food in1998, with a dramatic growth of nearly 10% at the end of the period, making it attain equality with the data of luxury goods in 2008.
Turn to the remainders, the expenditures on travel, entertainment, and clothing seemed to show an upward trend. To be more detailed,13% of the total money of individuals was spent on travel, then experiencing a mild rise of 7%, finishing as the lowest category. In addition, entertainment took up 18% at the beginning, followed by decreasing slightly to 16% by the end of the period, whereas the figure of clothing saw a significant reduction of 20%.
- The chart below shows five countries where australia students studied from 2004 to 2006 79
- the plans below show how the community centre looked like ten years ago before it was redesigned and how it looks now 11
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- the charts below show the Australian dollars in Australia s trade in 3 nations from 2004 to 2009 73
- Some people believe that it is a good idea that older people continue to work if it is possible for them to do Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of nearly 10% at the end of the period, making it attain equality with the data ...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was spent on travel, then experiencing a mild rise of 7%, finishing as the lowest...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81632653061 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89591764824 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579591836735 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.896358016 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.111111111 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0484361538147 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0206181653872 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240923539854 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.028889495551 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204341579487 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.