The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.
The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.
The discussion on the main benefits of science advancement has long been of strong interest and debate. Some individual argues that advancement in sciences is to make chores less time consuming to perform. Hereby, increasing the amount of relaxation for mankind. On the contrast, some scientists will say, technological advancements are what make complex intrinsic theory more accessible to solve. Thereby, creating more time to be dedicated on the problem. The assumption of this essay argues that increment in technological advancement cause more people have to relax in south Miami Beach or go for vacation in Hawaii. I mostly disagree with this that technological advancement are only meant for mankind to have more pleasurable time rather than deliberate on what to come, for 2 reasons.
Advancement in science has made unsolvable problems more realistic. New discovery creates an avenue for more research activities to be focus on. For example, the discovery of quantum dot in 2023 by Prof. Johnson, lay the foundation for the beginning of new branch of science on quantum dot field. Given that, this new discovery holds unknown number of values- whether good or bad, it causes for more time dedication to study what importance they hold. Even though the discovery makes possible for the developed of the novel anticancer drug, scientist is yet to ascertain the extent of toxicity, solubility or other drug ability or downside this new development may hold. Hereby, call for more time to be dedicated to this new field. In this example, the discovery of the quantum dot as the new most effective drug against cancer does not necessitate the creation for relaxation but rather create a new problem to solve. The one that require more time dedication to study the drug properties.
Likewise, technological advancement increases the productivity as well as income generated by a company. All companies want their work to progress. The main vision of a company is not to have downsides. The assumption of this prompt argues that because of the new development or technology a company made which allow exponential increase in the year revenue, necessitate them to relax and not work on how to improve on coming year revenue. For example, the discovery of land tractor makes farming easier, thereby increasing the amount of crops farmer can plant in a year and in turns increase the amount of income generated. Tin addition, this new discovery of tractor doesn’t mean the farmer will continue to have an exponential increase if the farmer does not plant more crops. In contrast it means it will make the planting easier to do. Therefore, advancement in sciences do not create more time for relation, rather it creates more productivity time.
Nevertheless, research conducted by Professor Ade from Yale University indicates that as technological advancements increase, people have more time to attend conferences. However, this does not necessarily translate into leisure at these conferences. On the contrary, it underscores how technological progress fosters improved collaboration, the development of innovative ideas, and advancements in various fields.
In conclusion, the belief that technological advancements are primarily meant to offer mankind more leisure time is fundamentally flawed. Science and technology aim to resolve complex problems, enhance productivity, and contribute to a deeper understanding of our world. These advancements necessitate dedication and hard work rather than relaxation. As Professor Ade's research suggests, technological progress often leads to more profound collaboration, creativity, and innovation, further solidifying the idea that progress in science and technology serves a greater purpose than leisure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-01 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 66
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position y 16
- 1 Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 62
- 1 Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 783, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...he farmer does not plant more crops. In contrast it means it will make the planting easi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3288.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 602.0 442.535393258 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46179401993 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95335121839 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08885781372 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471760797342 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1053.0 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5630272753 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65625 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396002335438 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113835715713 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171567214728 0.0758088955206 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320709778541 0.150359130593 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.307797713373 0.0667264976115 461% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 783, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...he farmer does not plant more crops. In contrast it means it will make the planting easi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3288.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 602.0 442.535393258 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46179401993 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95335121839 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08885781372 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471760797342 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1053.0 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5630272753 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65625 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396002335438 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113835715713 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171567214728 0.0758088955206 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320709778541 0.150359130593 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.307797713373 0.0667264976115 461% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.