Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programs. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
For a thriving nation, preservation and growth of cultures have been on the top concern. Some people believe that importing movies or television's programmes from foreign countries is necessary for nation's identity, whereas their opponents might argue that those produced locally could be more advantageous. In this essay, I would analyze both arguments and suggest that national cultures could be more beneficial if the aforementioned ideas could be executed in tandem.
There might be strong arguments in favour of importing more oversea movies or TV programmes. The foremost rationale is that foreign movies could be a contributing factor to the cultural integration of nations. This is due to the fact that film makers are prone to expressing their nation's cultures through their entertainment items, and the process of obtaining those could help to integrate one nation's cultures in other nation's cultures. This, as a result, could incentivize the form of positive cultures in a nation, which are aligned with the norm of globalization.
Nevertheless, the proponents of manufacturing local movies and TV programmes could be of the opinion that the local ones has made significant contribution to preserving national cultures. The reason for this argument is likely that through the local entertainment sectors, local filmmakers could spread the meaningful identities to nation's dweller, especially young generation, so that they could have more profound sights into the pivotal role of nation's identities. A good example for this is a well-known reality show, which is called "2 ngay 1 dem". This show is made to spread the beauty of Vietnamese cultures in different notable destinations of Vietnam to both national and international audiences; thus, enhancing the nation's cultures.
To conclude, each argument has their own sake to exist. However, both could work in combination in order to draw out full potential benefits in empowering conventional cultures of a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-18 | nguyenkhangtriem | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | Vibhu Khurana | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | Negin hadisadegh | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | ida.sh | 83 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | ida.sh | 62 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people today right by hand using a pen pencil or brush What are the reasons Is this a positive or a negative development 11
- The picture below shows the process of producing ceramic pots Summarizing the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
- Everyday millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 61
- Government should make laws about people s nutrition and food choices Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that the governments should care more about the elderly while others argue that it is better to invest in the young generatiom in terms of education Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50814332248 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0492461962 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553745928339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9739309265 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.076923077 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17538664473 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716197298864 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512457216102 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110936311802 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455279046478 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.