Many people may work from home using modern technology today. Some people think that only the workers benefit from this and not the employers. Do you agree or disagree?
With the development of technology nowadays, many companies offer their employees to work online. However, some people believe that this type of work only benefits the workers. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this statement. Allowing employees to work online can forester their performance and save money for the employers.
On the one hand, if workers can choose their workplaces, it can enhance their performance and make a profit for the companies. To clarify, working online through laptops or computers allows employees to choose their own working spaces which can be their houses or coffee shops. These destinations offer a comfortable and no-pressure working space. Therefore, working in these places may boost employee’s creativity and productivity. It is undeniable that this improvement is beneficial for the employers.
On the other hand, working online can save money for the organizations. For instance, when a company chooses to work online, they can save the renting money or the purchasing money for infrastructure which can be used for other important purposes. In addition, working online also facilitates the international expansion. Employers can recruit international employees achieving high quality for a position. This type of recruitment will expand the company’s network and bring many international profits for the organization.
In conclusion, the development of technology brings many advantages for the workers. However, working online also has many benefits for employers ranging from the improvement of performance to saving money and facilitating international expansion. Both employers and employees need to use technology flexibly in order to improve work achievements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | nhungdph | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | deolkuljeet1991 | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | deolkuljeet1991 | 61 | view |
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 73
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others believe individuals can also do some things to solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7568627451 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18404809092 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9623239247 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3529411765 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191330236396 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748829391955 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643294803014 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140694598231 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714434342348 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7568627451 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18404809092 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9623239247 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3529411765 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191330236396 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748829391955 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643294803014 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140694598231 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714434342348 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.