The maps below show the changes that occurred to a town named Willington in 1780, 1860, and 2000.
The maps compared the changes that happened to a town called Willington in 1780, 1860 and 2000.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is clear that there was a considerable increase in the amount of residential and commercial. There were the appearances of a bridge, lake, roads, and public creation, the river unchanged over the years.
In 1780, there were 100 homes and a large region of the town belonged to farms and forests. The river flowed from the north to the south; in 1860, there was a bridge across the river. Many farms and forestry had been removed for the construction of a road access, which led to the residential area. The number of homes in 1860 had doubled with 200 homes.
In 2000, farms and wood forest had been entirely cleared, replaced by two schools and 3 sports fields. There was another road access between the residential homes and these public places. Many shops lining the southern part of the river. The final addition was a lake for birds located in the south at the end of the river.
- The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in a number of different places during your childhood years 78
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in a number of different places during your childhood years 78
- Many people are now spending more and more time traveling to work or school Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits 78
- The maps below show the changes that occurred to a town named Willington in 1780 1860 and 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71270718232 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42278894892 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9875999632 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.5454545455 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159978527061 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689249696854 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141683894685 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155445286862 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204381177638 0.0819641961636 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.