Task 1 The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004

Essay topics:

Task 1: The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004.

The table illustrates the proportion of daily oil production in Nigeria, Chad, Congo and Somalia between 2000 and 2004.

In general, Nigeria and Congo had the largest proportion, followed by Chad and Somalia. Nigeria had the clearest fluctuation.

It can be seen easily seen that, in 2000, the figure for Congo’s oil production was the highest with 275,000. Nigeria was the second place of oil provider ( 205,000 ). From 2001 to 2004, Congo’s figures stayed unsteadily, while Nigeria experienced little fluctuation. In 2004, there was a significant switch between these two countries. At the end of the given period,
Nigeria’s proportion increased rapidly and achieved the first place, and Congo reached the second.

There were also some noticeable points with two countries left. Between 2000 and 2004, Somalia’s figure was stable, and increased steadily each year. In the year of 2004, Somalia reached the amount of 50,000, which was 10 times more than the figure in the first year. The proportion of Chad’s soil production had not been reported since 2003, with 8,000 in the same year. This country had the most considerable change, in 2004, it catched up with Somalia, with 50,000.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-21 Yashainu291 89 view
2024-02-16 Sang Sang Sang 61 view
2023-11-13 Tung lam 78 view
2023-08-04 húc tinh 85 view
2023-07-20 Phuongnguyen1803 11 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o and Somalia between 2000 and 2004. In general, Nigeria and Congo had the la...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igeria had the clearest fluctuation. It can be seen easily seen that, in 2000...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ria was the second place of oil provider 205,000 . From 2001 to 2004, Congo’s fig...
^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he second place of oil provider 205,000 . From 2001 to 2004, Congo’s figures stay...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lace, and Congo reached the second. There were also some noticeable points w...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28645833333 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61392673119 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0338380991 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0769230769 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7692307692 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1994759222 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075766709219 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844072296415 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120813068261 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124475500076 0.0819641961636 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.