The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram compares the layout of an airport now and a proposed development for the next year.
It is clear that there are significant changes in the design of the airport and related infrastructure. We can see that there will be more gates and facilites in the redevelopment of the site in the next year.
At present, there are only eight gates and one walkway for people to use, but the figure will increase to 18 gates and a sky train will be built to replace the existing walkway. The number of door for departures and arrivals also increase two times in the next year.
In the center areas, besides some facilities such as security passport control, passport control system are still remained in the same location, there are some new areas like café, bag drop, ATM for people. On the of that, car hire area is also built in the corner next to the arrival doors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-08 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-16 | ThHuong | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 717.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56687898089 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41967807392 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0799742861 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151132303256 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778758851004 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681740407336 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108642994571 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701799547818 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.