One school of thought holds the idea that the growth of business and cultural connection among nations is an upside advancement while other people believe that countries’ identities will be faded. This essay attempts to shed lights on the both perspective before concluding that I am in favor with the former notion.
One the one hand, tie up the relationship between countries in business and cultural aspects could be fraught with pitfalls in some extents. One rational in favor of this view is that this trend could dilute the national identities of nations. This argument could be reinforced by the fact that the affect of media and mass communication could perpetuate dominate of the culture while diluting the local traditional and identities. For instance, the prevalence of Westernized styles may overshadow the traditional costumes. As a consequence, it is to blame for the loss of cultural identities of a small community. In addition, the massive spreading of international goods on the local market could bring an adverse bearing on the in incomes of local corporations. The conquering of foreign products may have an effect on the local consumers behaviors, and it gives rise to the purchase options of individuals onto oversea items instead of the indigenous ones. Subsequently, the consumption market for domestic goods is mitigated, and this could act as a precursor to the low revenues of enterprises inside the country.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reason as to why I am convinced that enhance the multinational business and cultural bonds are of paramount importance for communities. First and foremost, it could bestow an enormous benefit upon the economy of the states. This could be interpreted by the fact that the global economic interactions could stimulate economic growth by creating new markets and attracting investments. Therefore, this tendency helps our societies to stand a greater chance of landing a thriving economy in the foreseeable future. Another notable feature is that it could foster the diplomacy among nations. This is because the trade of economic and cultural contact could act as an urge to the strong diplomatic relations and reduce the likelihood of conflicts among nations.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that the interconnection among the states could have some downsides, I would contend that the upsides which it offers are significantly more noteworthy.
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 89
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 84
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 84
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in million of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparion where relevants 56
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...try. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reason as to why I am con...
^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fers are significantly more noteworthy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28974358974 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02547696209 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9664391295 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.352941176 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14249052555 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452963478603 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606615183286 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969534038221 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632482750302 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...try. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reason as to why I am con...
^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fers are significantly more noteworthy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28974358974 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02547696209 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9664391295 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.352941176 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14249052555 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452963478603 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606615183286 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969534038221 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632482750302 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.