Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas. Why? Should young people be encouraged to do farming work?
It is widely acknowledged that the amount of young people working in agriculture in the countryside is reducing. This essay attempts to provide further clarifications upon this tendency before concluding that it is beneficial to motivate the young generation to do farming work.
There are a host of rationales attributed to the fact that the agricultural work is becoming less doing by the youth. First and foremost, the advancement of technology over decades have created variety new occupations in several sectors such as engineering, artificial intelligence or mechanizing. On account of this expansion, the young generation could stand a greater chance in landing a career which suitable for them among the diversity options. Another driving factor is that the wages earned from jobs in the big cities are higher than the incomes from doing farmwork in rural. Therefore, young individuals would rather seek employment in the urban area than staying in the countryside in order to afford a better life standard.
However, there are a myriad of compelling reason as to why I would contend that encourage the youth doing farmwork could bestow benefit upon society as a whole. One key rationale in favor of this view is that agriculture is one of the pivotal sectors contributed to the social economy. With the massive amount of nourishment produced annually, it is necessary to maintain the redundant labor sources in this field, and this could act as the precursor to the growth of an agriculturally sustainable economy. Moreover, without the lack of farming work, crops and food production will be mitigate. As a consequence, the national authority will have to export food commodities from other nations in the absence of agriculturally manufacture independent, and this act as the precursor to the deprive of a country’s thriving economy.
In conclusion, young generation should be stimulated to do farmwork in countryside, and I am convinced that it is giving rise to aforementioned positive ramifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-22 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | hinhin411 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | phuong_anh_07 | 58 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | thaoduong1902 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 84
- When choosing a job salary is the most important decision To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- People in many countries are spending less time with their families What are the reasons and effects of this 78
- Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas Why Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ation to do farming work. There are a host of rationales attributed to the fact th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...r life standard. However, there are a myriad of compelling reason as to why I would ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ndent, and this act as the precursor to the deprive of a country’s thriving economy. In c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30218068536 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14222601055 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573208722741 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8937939146 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.923076923 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296723839355 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961290845959 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831429689835 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185722235314 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860138035081 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ation to do farming work. There are a host of rationales attributed to the fact th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...r life standard. However, there are a myriad of compelling reason as to why I would ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ndent, and this act as the precursor to the deprive of a country’s thriving economy. In c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30218068536 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14222601055 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573208722741 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8937939146 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.923076923 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296723839355 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961290845959 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831429689835 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185722235314 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860138035081 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.