The diagrams below compare the layout of a typical Japanese office and a typical American office.
The drawing about the design of a typical Japanese office and a typical American office. There are diverse differences in decoration between Japanese and American offices.
In the typical Japanese office, its decoration tends to be classical and traditional. The manager department is separated to others. This space is so large in order to create formal importance when placing the nearby window being only one in the layout. Two section manager seats are located the middle of the most prevalent leader and remaining officers so that they keep a connection role. Six combo tables for each section putting along two sides are workspaces of officers.
In contrast, the typical American design should be more friendly, comfortable and convenient than the Japanese one. The most crucial leader has a little bigger space compared to two section manager tables. These tables are arranged nearby a window similarly and fairly. There is an opposite window belonged to all staffs because function rooms such as a copy room, storage and two meeting rooms could ultimate the natural sunlight. All officer tables are put at the middle of the layout, thus it raises up the important tasks and rights of these specialists.
In summary, the Japanese style in department arranges is classical and formal in order. The American design is more not only comfortable and friendly but also higher convenient and effective because its layout is available for function rooms.
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
- Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress but they should be concerned about the quality at work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen a pencil or brush What are the reasons for this Is the decline in writing by hand a positive or negative development 84
- It was predicted that people living in the twenty first century would have more free time than ever before because of improvements in technology To what extent has this prediction come true 89
- The diagrams below compare the layout of a typical Japanese office and a typical American office 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, thus, in contrast, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23829787234 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59007402919 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570212765957 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4002393541 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9285714286 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7857142857 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283204768628 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952429936688 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123489369617 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199993742996 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132946865001 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.