Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology. However, this change may only benefit workers, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a tendency that staffs should working on the online space instead of present at physical rooms. In my essay, I do not believe that this movement only bring advantages to employees and not to employers, but also its could cause some problems to staffs and generate many benefits to company’s shareholders.
On the one hand, many staffs tend to overvalue the conveniences of working at their own home such as saving time to commuting, being flexible or less daily spending costs. However, some problems resulting from online working environment. The first one must be a mental life style. This means that the internet working flatforms do not enable workers to communicate face to face. So they could lead to stress spirit issues because they do not go out and are less opportunity to social communications frequently. In addition, working from home may precipitate the personal physical health. To be more detailed, the lack of outdoor activities should make employees lazy. Then these could become fat and meet the obesity issue. These above-mentioned difficulties must be some evidences of the negative side when working from home.
On the other hand, most shareholders often mention that working from home does not bring any advantage to their organization since it is very hard to control online workers via some technology tools. But if these owners take advantage of online working spaces considerably, there will be more benefits to their companies. Saving operating costs are undeniable examples obviously as the internet workspace allows these owners to spend extremely less costs in decoration, electric and water costs and daily expenditure costs, especially rent costs or the cost for physical departments. As a result, the generally final profit of the unit using cutting edge technologies could rise up in the long run. For example, Abbott Lab encourages its staffs to work online two days each week. Google and Microsoft permit their employees not to come offline departments if there are not urgent meetings.
In conclusion, although working from home may allow workers to enjoy the working time at their own home and provide some concerns to employers, it still could both cause many struggling effects to staffs and make shareholders’ investments in the organizations orienting high tech tools in management profitable highly in long run.
- The charts below give information about the world s top three producers for four different dairy products milk cheese butter milk powder in the year of 2012 67
- Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology However this change may only benefit workers not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 67
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...mployees and not to employers, but also its could cause some problems to staffs and...
^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun costs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... allows these owners to spend extremely less costs in decoration, electric and water...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2467191601 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82527126876 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569553805774 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.439552078 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.055555556 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244733458105 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735904490653 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539368103343 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152151995784 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242598849891 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.