The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph illustrates European country in eating fish and some different kinds of meat between 1979 and 2004. It can be seen from the graph that fish is the less consumption and chicken is the most, where beef and lamb are in the middle.
Europeans consuming chicken increases from year to year. In 1979, people eat slightly below 150 grams per week until in 2004 it becomes 250 grams per week. Compared to fish, people’s interest in eating fish steadily decreased from a little above 50 grams to around 50 grams per person per week.
Lamb and beef consumption has decreased quite significantly. People eat beef from 200 grams to about 100 grams per week, although in mid-1979 and 1984 it experienced an increase from under 200 grams to around 250 grams but until 2004 it continued to decline. People’s enthusiasm with lamb starts from 150 grams and decreases to around 50 grams per week.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 60
- The graph below shows how people buy music 55
- Some say that the internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together To what extent do to you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 81
- Some think increasing business and cultural contact between nations is positive Others think it leads to the disappearance of the national identity Discuss both views and state your own opinion 42
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 156 200
No. of Characters: 724 1000
No. of Different Words: 87 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.534 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.641 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.359 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 41 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 30 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.746 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.125 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.48 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.48 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.148 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4