The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart below illustrates one nation’s export revenue from five distinct industries during 2015 and 2016 and the table data presents the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Upon analyzing the data, it becomes evident that petroleum products and engineered goods generated most of the national export turnover while textiles was the lowest-valued sector. In addition, except for gems and jewelry, there was an upward trend in all exported products, especially, textiles experienced the largest transition in the period.
In terms of the two major sources of export revenue during the two recorded years, petroleum products and engineered goods had comparable export values, with the former category having slightly higher income than the latter. In 2015, gas and oil products achieved the highest income with around 61 billion dollars followed by approximately 58 billion dollars for engineered products. However, in 2016, the figure for petroleum products just increased modestly by 3% while engineered products witnessed a significant rise of 8.5% and reached the same level as petroleum fuels.
Besides, the remaining three kinds of export goods contributed to a national budget of under 50 billion dollars. Gems and jewelry ranked third in five areas generating roughly 42 billion dollars in 2015 followed by agricultural products with slightly above 30 billion dollars. However, the following year, the income of precious stones and ornaments underwent a slight drop of 5.18% while turnover from farming products seemed to stay stable with quite a small change rate of 0.81%. The export earnings of garment products were the lowest which was approximately half of petroleum products during the period despite a dramatic climb of 15,24% in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant 78
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...slightly higher income than the latter. In 2015, gas and oil products achieved the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, third, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47841726619 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66089083664 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 283.868780488 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.9691782261 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.3 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26239959231 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110568495776 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145000668047 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21041623186 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187862262331 0.0819641961636 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.