In some countries, health care is free, paid for by the state. In other countries, payment is divided between the state and people themselves. Discuss both systems, and say which one is better.
In certain countries, health care is either provided free of charge by the state or financed through a combination of state funding and individual contributions. Both systems have their merits and drawbacks, but I contend that the divided payment system is superior to the free one.
Health care free of charge in many countries can have certain benefits. Firstly, it can grant free access to essential health services in impoverished areas, where people are unable to afford such amenities. This can help them save their lives when suffering from a disease despite poverty. For example, children living in impoverished areas can receive immediate medical care without financial burden, thus potentially saving their lives. Moreover, state-funded health services can lead to a wider spread of medical facilities throughout the country, ensuring access for all citizens irrespective of their financial status, thereby improving the efficacy of public health care services to some extent.
The divided payment system for health care also offers advantages in certain aspects. A notable advantage is the adequate funding for medical purposes. When patients purchase their own treatment, the fees contribute to the funding of the general health system, thus alleviating financial pressure on the government. This fund can also be utilized to discover new medicine and effective curing methods. Furthermore, paying for health services allows patients to choose more suitable and effective treatment options than those offered by the state. Therefore, their health conditions can improve significantly due to the suitability of treating methods they pay to choose.
Considering two systems, I suppose that the divided payment system is better since the government cannot sustain the high costs of treating certain diseases over the long term. If the state has to solely bear this burden, the public health system is likely to face a financial crisis, rendering it inadequate to the increasing demand for health care.
In conclusion, state-funded health services can ensure widespread healthcare accessibility, particularly in impoverished areas and to some extent, enhance public health. However, I assume that there can be a risk of financial crisis if the government has to cover the high costs of treating a diverse range of diseases. Therefore, the system with separated payment is better by giving enough funding and allowing patients to pick the best treatment for their health conditions.
- In many parts of the world some famous people are considered role models and they are having an increasing influence on the young Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development f 56
- In some countries students live with their family while studying at a university In other countries students attend university in another city Do you think the advantages of living away from the family while attending university outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money on researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money Discuss both these views and give your own op 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'cares'.
Suggestion: cares
... is superior to the free one. Health care free of charge in many countries can ha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, i suppose, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55497382199 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82169810732 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.077818425 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.888888889 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296984422683 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101300285045 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738766802864 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191710613882 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585377313073 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'cares'.
Suggestion: cares
... is superior to the free one. Health care free of charge in many countries can ha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, i suppose, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55497382199 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82169810732 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.077818425 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.888888889 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296984422683 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101300285045 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738766802864 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191710613882 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585377313073 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.