Some people think that good health is a basic human need, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages?
Good health is a fundamental need of humans, so it is believed that profit-making companies should not be involved in running medical services. Although this approach has both merits and demerits, I assume that it is more beneficial to some extent.
On the one hand, medication from profit-making corporations can cause patients some troubles. Firstly, it might put patients under financial pressure due to the expensive fees of the services. Since some medical companies invest a huge fund on specialized equipment and doctors, they might charge patients more money to compensate for the money loss and even make profits. This makes it unfair for poor patients demanding the health services from these companies, because they cannot afford the costly fees. Secondly, health services provided by profit-making companies might solely be for business purposes, instead of medical. Diseases such as cancer and diabetes require a significant amount of money for long term treatment, some so-called medical corporations might utilize this to illegally increase fees to steal money from patients, instead of spending on medical purposes. For instance, some cancer patients choose public hospitals for treatment because they have been the victims of overpriced services from money-making private hospitals.
On the other hand, I believe that the disadvantages of this approach are only applied to some unlucky cases and patients can benefit significantly from it. This approach, first of all, can reduce the pressure on public systems, especially when it comes to a huge demand for healthcare. It can reduce the overdemand for public hospitals as the services from companies provide immediate services without letting patients wait for a long time in turn. For example, Vinmec, a private hospital from Vingroup has helped many patients survive during Covid-19 pandemic in Vietnam. Without the share of demand to private hospitals, some public hospitals cannot be able to save the timing for patients. Moreover, health services from money-profit companies can be more personalized as they can allow individuals to choose the suitable treating methods. The hospital fees might be costly but the variety of modern and effective curing methods suitable to patients’ conditions are worth the expense. Patients’ openness in selecting appropriate treatment can help them improve better than that given by public services.
In conclusion, although there are some drawbacks of prices and companies’ illegal motives, the benefits of medical services run by profit-making companies outweigh them with its contribution to lessen the overdemand for public hospitals and its allowance for patients to choose suitable treatment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-27 | reverjae | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | reverjae | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Đoàn Nam Khánh | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Đoàn Nam Khánh | 73 | view |
- With the pressures on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school eg physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 56
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The widespread use of Internet has brought many problems What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of Internet What solutions can you suggest 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57627118644 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86993075348 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515738498789 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6745851512 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.944444444 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24915255182 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961560150862 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100187973844 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201068193683 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811426068726 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.