Some people think the manufacturers or shopping malls should sell less packaged products and others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is a matter of debate whether the manufacturers should reduce the amount of packaged products or customers are responsible for buying products with less packaging. In my opinion, the former is a viable solution to the problems that buyers are facing, instead of the latter.
On the one hand, individuals believing stores or companies should lessen the packaging of products is due to their concern of environmental protection. Discarded packaging from users is known to be one of the main culprits that contributes significantly to the worsening quality of the environment. Thus, many people think that shopping malls should provide customers with fewer packaged goods in order to minimize the amount of thrown-away packaging on the streets or to the oceans. Moreover, people assume that some packaging might hinder buyers’ convenience as it is multi-layered or too bulky, which might waste customers’ time and efforts on unboxing. If a buyer sees a product with heavy packaging, they might feel reluctant to carry it home due to the weight.
On the other hand, others assume that people are responsible for buying purchasers less packaged products because they trust that need to be conscious of their own purchasing preferences. If people purchase items like food or clothing and store them in their own containers or bags, this might decrease the demand for packaged products. Owing to this, many manufacturers have to slowly lessen the packaging they produce, which is likely to prevent packaging trash from being littered to roads or seas.
Considering two notions, I believe that although the second belief might be a suggestion to raise awareness of customers instead of helping them the most efficiently, because there are some people unfamiliar with this approach. As when a company reduces packaging, people have to provide themselves with their own bags to carry goods. Furthermore, less packaging means an easier way to open products as it saves time and efforts.
In conclusion, although raising people’s awareness of buying things with fewer packaging is practical, I believe that manufacturers’ approaches to reduce packaging are the most beneficial to every customer.
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 78
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 61
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 73
- The table shows independent film releases by genre in the UK and Republic of Ireland in 2012 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31896551724 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93928717599 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9262122483 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.214285714 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420490394244 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144892155921 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879293982846 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241584640924 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033520476093 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.