The chart below shows the percentages of men and women aged 60-64 in employment in four countries, in 1970 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the proportions of male and female workers at various ages from 60 to 64 in four nations, during the years 1970 and 2000.
Overall, the percentages of male workers increased in all the four countries. It is also noticeable that Japan was the country with the highest percentages of workers of both genders in both years.
Regarding the men in employment, Japan was ranked first in 1970, with over 70%, and grew slightly to 86% in 2000. Belgium started at about one-fourth of that for Japan, in the bottom position, but quadrupled in the end. The proportions for USA and Australian male workers were 55% and 47% respectively, and these figures rose to around 75% in the final year.
Concerning the women in employment, Japan was 40% in the first year, being at the top level. This country still maintained the dominant position in 2000, with precisely 43%. Belgium was at the lowest level in the two years, with 7% and 8%. The USA stood at the second place in the first year, at around 40%., and dropped to 36% in the final year. Australian female workers were around a half of those for Japan in 1970 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-01 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- It will be better for both individuals and society if driverless cars cars can drive themselves become more widely spread To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some educationalists say every child should be taught to play musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph shows information about technology usage in the UK over time Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62745098039 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47874470593 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8431377467 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8181818182 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127860934195 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053012799346 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551715967166 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961243013397 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573748494919 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.