Many today feel that attention spans are becoming shorter due to the prevalence of social media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been a recent issue about numerous people who have lessened their focus because of social media daily use these days. Personally, I share the same perspective of this statement which I will outline several reasons in the following paragraph.
First of all, it is true that short concentration span may arouse sleep deprivation among most workers living in an unbalanced lifestyle, such as shift working or tight deadlines. Due to insufficient sleep recovery, many may encounter greater difficulty in concentration, leading to confusion and impairments in both short-term and long-term memory. Moreover, individuals who work as solopreneurs or service engage in multitasking activities. This necessity arises from the various needs to manage customer requests, prompting them to frequently shift between different tasks. As a result, they may become distractable and prone to several mental ailments, such as cerebrovascular diseases.
In contrast, social media makes people’s less attention, since its excessive use of AI induces one to be addicted, notably in automatic short video features on Instagram and TikTok. This contributes to procrastination as users tend to underestimate task time while seeking satisfaction and perceiving surplus time. Additionally, this platform engenders a Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), particularly in students driven by a desire for social recognition. They seek to be part of current trends by aligning with what is currently popular and their peer group. This distraction results in poor classroom presence and school grades.
Overall, in my point of view, engaging in social media significantly affects short attention due to AI-generated content and the fear of missing out (FOMO). This is as long as individuals should prioritize getting adequate rest.
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack support because of their parents absence Discuss both th
- The leaders of most organisations tend to be older people However some argue that younger people make better bosses To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some parents allow their teenage children to live independently away from home Other parents don t want their teenage children to live away from them Which do you think is better and why Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 84
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack support because of their parents absence Discuss both th
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...es. Due to insufficient sleep recovery, many may encounter greater difficulty in concent...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, while, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62271062271 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15099657272 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.714285714286 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6686943415 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111212876219 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304576435166 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349043826708 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648974918186 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230784867443 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...es. Due to insufficient sleep recovery, many may encounter greater difficulty in concent...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, while, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62271062271 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15099657272 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.714285714286 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6686943415 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111212876219 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304576435166 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349043826708 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648974918186 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230784867443 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.