Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams (for example, football). Other people think that taking part in individual sports such as swimming is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While some people believe that participating in single sports, for instance swimming, is preferable, others point out that people may positively engage more in squad sports, such as football. Both views appear to bring several different perspectives in selecting some types of sports which I will expound in the elucidate paragraph
On the one hand, proponents of preferring section in non-team sports have more benefits because this can enhance personal development to reach the highest performance during the match. For instance, Mike Tyson, a former American professional boxer, became a great champion due to his perseverance in mastering boxing skills. Furthermore, the athletes persistently have to maintain their personal value to avoid the negative issues in public. Take Cristiano Ronaldo as an example, a great football player who always keeps a good reputation along with being regarded as a talented athlete non-controversial.
On the other hand, some people argue that physical activities which are played in groups can elevate communication skills. This means that good interaction skills (connection and cooperation) can establish stronger and teamwork habits which can increase a sense of responsibility to achieve good results, as seen in Golden State Warriors, US National basketball team. Moreover, how the team becomes greater is contributed by strategic thinking of some members to create tactical techniques. It seems that they significantly encourage and direct the team to do the best. Thus, they pass through various experiences resiliently to reach the successful team during their journey
To sum up, it seems to me that physical exercise played in a group is more advantageous. This includes interpersonal skills and critical thinking that can create great teamwork. This is provided that an individual keeps building up top-level of personal performance
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-18 | MEBC Class | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Fila | 61 | view |
- Many employers are looking for people with good social skills as well as good qualifications Are social skills as important as qualifications How could this be a problem 89
- These days older people who have retired often choose to spend money on themselves for example on holidays rather than save money for their children Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think the manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products while others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In more and more countries people choose to give money on special occasions rather than personally giving gifts Why might this be the case Is it a positive or negative development 80
- Recent advances in medicine have resulted in an increase in life expectancy over the past four years Do you think that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...as football. Both views appear to bring several different perspectives in selecting some types of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...types of sports which I will expound in the elucidate paragraph On the one hand, proponent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60839160839 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04410341517 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65034965035 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2744619332 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227445070922 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671635683587 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527480379506 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123462680016 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581869848098 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.