Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It has been stated that it is beneficial for kids to be around pets however, the opposite opinion believes that it can be unsafe for children. Both point of views will be debated in this essay.
On the one hand, it is true that there are some risks in living with pets especially in a family with young children since humans and animals behave in a completely different way. Some owners might not know enough about pets’ behaviors which can lead to various negative effects. For example, being out of hand or even uncontrollable in some situation, being the host to parasites that also affect the family’s member without anyone noticing, and even the harm from the pets’ toys. Moreover, parents need to take extra care which can be time consuming and stressful for the family.
On the other hand, aside from all the risks, dogs and cats can be helpful as well. Many households are familiar with pets for a long time therefore, they can understand their pets and raise their children to understand them too. Keeping pets help the children to be more responsible, and according to many studies it has been proven that children who grew up with pets are most likely to be merciful and gentle. Moreover, pets can save children from fatal situations. There are many videos on the internet as evidence. For instance, a clip of dog chasing bad guy trying to bombard the young child, and a clip of a cat closing the door to prevent the baby from crawling downstairs.
In conclusion, although their can still be harm from keeping animals, the benefits of pets are impacted. For the reasons discussed, I support pets in the family since they have more advantages with the right care.
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper books Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 56
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
- The graph below provides information about three different types of music in England 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73129251701 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44619314268 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2735492233 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180241531967 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672507047781 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357774755295 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121421400735 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248278151952 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.