The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore

Essay topics:

The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.

The par-chart shows the mean level of involving in education, the pie-charts illustrate the highest education level of adults, and both of them for the period between 2000 and 2010 in Singapore.

Overall, we recognize, the male had the desire to spend more years in education than female, moreover, the percentage of people who liked to finish their high-education increased.

Mainly, the man motivation to stay more years in education increased steadily from nearly 9 year to almost 12-year, while the woman roughly stayed at the same desire to spend more years in education between 8-9 years, and both of the for the same period between 2000-2010.

For the education level for mature people, in2010 mater holder was around third of adults, but in 2000 the was under a tenth of matures. On the other hand, if we take a look for the adults who dropped-out after their primary school, in 2000 they was a quarter of them ,and in 2010 the almost vanished with just 2.1% of adults.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-06 tata 73 view
2024-06-06 tata 78 view
2024-06-06 tata 67 view
2023-08-08 tata 78 view
2023-08-05 tata 78 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o stay more years in education increased steadily from nearly 9 year to almost 12...
^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hool, in 2000 they was a quarter of them ,and in 2010 the almost vanished with jus...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, third, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84023668639 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51386686744 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573964497041 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.395495267 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.6 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279162204035 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152295472402 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124395661705 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172901043078 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132737816605 0.0819641961636 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.