The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income that five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.
The table demonstrates the rate of monthly domestic budget that five distinctive European regions allocate on refreshments and beverage, accommodation, costumes and recreational activities.
On the whole, it can be observed that the inhabitants in every region are inclined to spend almost all of their wages on sustenance and pay less attention to the rest categories. Additionally, costume the aspect with the least budget allocation except Turkey, as opposed to the housing aspect which is the most budget allocation.
Regarding the aspects that occupy the larger proportion of budget, Turkey has the highest budget allocation on refreshments and beverages, with the record at 36% and it is slightly higher than the second position, which is Spain, by 5%. Meanwhile, household expenditure on this category in England, France and Germany is about a quarter of their salary, with the figures ranging from 22% to 27%. Similarly, one third of the budgets of these three countries are spent on accommodation, with the figure being recorded at 31%, 33%, 37% correspondingly. Lastly, Spain is the lowest in this aspect, with the record being at 18%, which is lower than Turkey at 4th place by about 2%.
In terms of the categories that occupy less proportion than the two aforementioned aspects. To talk about clothing, it is the least paid aspect. Costumes is an additional category so the record for this aspect is not too significant. In three countries Germany, UK and Turkey, people pay a minority of their wage to buy clothes with the figures being recorded at 15%, 11%, 12% respectively. Meanwhile, the record for this aspects of the two remaining countries is not too high as well, France accounts for 8%, which is higher than Spain, by 1%. Coming to the recreational activities, it is not as important as clothing, so the data for this category is not too considerable as well. Germany and France are the two regions with higher budget allocation than the three rest countries with the record at 19% and 15% correspondingly. Meanwhile, household expenses on this aspect in France, UK, Turkey, with the figure ranging from 10%-13%
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below illustrates how two types of tea including Pu erh and ripe tea are manufactured 84
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly but most patients do not follow an exercise routine Why do you think this happens How can people be encouraged to exercise regularly 73
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve distinctive European regions allocate on refreshments and beverage, accommodat...
^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd beverages, with the record at 36% and it is slightly higher than the second po...
^^
Line 7, column 418, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...respectively. Meanwhile, the record for this aspects of the two remaining countries ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, regarding, second, similarly, so, third, well, while, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 965.302439024 186% => OK
No of words: 351.0 196.424390244 179% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11396011396 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94492371881 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475783475783 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 283.868780488 187% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7667555216 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0887411822495 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332348553895 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344833822749 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704774744999 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435170365098 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.