The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over six months in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the change in the number of enquiries asked by three different forms of communication, such as in person, by letter ot email, and by telephone, in one city for the first six months in 2011 and these enquiries were received by the Tourist Information Office.
Overall, while enquiries through letters or emails saw a slight decrease throughout the period, the other two means of communication, including in person and by telephone, experienced upward trends. In addition, the number of requests sent by people who preferred to meet directly jumped significantly over a 6-month period and ranked in the top position.
Regarding the number of people who liked to send their requests through emails or letters, the figure showed that the number of these means received by the Tourist Information Office witnessed a small decline in the first two months, from about nearly 800 requests in January to 700 requests in March. Furthermore, the data dropped notably between March and May with over 300 enquiries, and it remained stable until the end of the period, which consequently made it rank in the third position.
Enter the other two forms of communication. Ranked in the first position in the beginning, the number of enquiries received by telephone started roughly at 900 requests in January, and fluctuated slightly in the next three months, before significantly rising in the last two months, at 1600 enquiries in June. The Tourist Information Office, on the other hand, received about 400 enquiries from people who met in person in the first month of the year; however, this figure began to jump remarkably until the end of the period and surpassed the group of using the telephone to place in the first rank.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Plan A shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, third, while, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 289.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03114186851 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75842142945 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512110726644 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.4172880833 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.75 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.125 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.23603664747 286% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217828307272 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907253902068 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086405966418 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148037590133 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835020436116 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, third, while, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 289.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03114186851 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75842142945 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512110726644 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.4172880833 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.75 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.125 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.23603664747 286% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217828307272 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907253902068 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086405966418 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148037590133 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835020436116 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.