The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the trend in opening and closing of stores in a specific nation from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, the number of shops closed seemed to slightly decrease, with the exception of 2015, while the number of new shops opened in this time range showed a wide range of figures, but generally illustrated a dramatic downward.
In 2011, there were approximately 8500 shops opened. Then, this number went down sharply by nearly 50%. Although the figure witnessed a rise in the next two years, many of the stores continually closed after that, putting the data back to 4000 stores in 2015. Eventually, It was seen that the number of opened shops went on decreasing and ended at 3000 new stores in 2018, showing the lowest number in seven years.
The number of shop closures saw small fluctuations with around roughly 6200 stores, until 2015, it dramatically went down to reach the bottom at over 500 stores. However, after this year, the reported figures increased to about 5100 shops and remained stable till 2018.
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 84
- Nowadays an increasing number of people with health problems are using alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their normal doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart and graph below give information about three categories of workers in Australia and unemployment levels in three countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ops closed seemed to slightly decrease, with the exception of 2015, while the number of new shops ope...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89714285714 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42149557429 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8032257132 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317765635854 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1357584784 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781374979299 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191194054085 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450197085148 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.