The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the proportion of the labor force in the country of Australia across the five sectors from 1962 to 2012.
Overall, the services increased, manufacturing and agriculture decreased in percentage terms, and construction as well as mining remained almost the same. It is also noticeable that the services were the sector with the largest proportion among the five.
Regarding the period from 1962 to 1992, the services started with the highest figure, over 50%. Then this sector rose steadily over years, reaching more than 70% in 1992. The manufacturing and agriculture began with around 25% and 10% respectively and then dropped by 10% and 3% respectively in the final year. The fields of construction and mining did not change much, at around 10% and 0% respectively during the provided period.
Concerning the rest of the given time, the services still experienced an upward trend to nearly 80% in 2012, maintaining the top position. In contrast, the manufacturing and agriculture still saw a downward tendency, to precisely 10% and approximately 4%. The other two sectors did not fluctuate much, at finally nearly returned to the starting points.
- The diagram below shows the plan for a proposed new town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram below shows the process of making cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in prices of three metals during 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, regarding, so, still, then, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25263157895 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92034605015 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0865107477 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0632726223943 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025666309835 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375397577982 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510490888908 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464771737897 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.