The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features and make comprasions where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features, and make comprasions where relevant.

The table illustrates the average distance in miles travel per person per year in eight distinct modes of travel in 1985 and 2000. It is obvious that the car has most distance among other modes and the Taxi has the lowest in addition the total number of distances in 1985 was higher than 2000.
As can be seen, the Walking, Bicycle, and local bus reduced in 2000 ordered by 18, 10, and 47 numbers and other remined groups increased in 2000. The most important group that increased significantly was car by about 1700 miles. The Taxi, Train, Long distance bus, and car modes ordered rise up approximately 29, 75, 70, and 1700 miles. The taxi and bicycle used under 100 miles in 1985 and 2000 that meant people did not like to use these modes of travel. By contrast the statistics showed people of society have a good tendency to use Car mode for traveling.
As a result, the total average distance in miles by 2000 raised around 2000 miles while some groups declined and some else went up.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-17 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-04-17 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-04-17 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-04-17 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-04-17 Ahmad_off 78 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...proximately 29, 75, 70, and 1700 miles. The taxi and bicycle used under 100 miles i...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54748603352 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21563147083 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6322740125 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.75 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140860926316 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659796425629 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447418642349 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977262560743 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439890289123 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.