Some educationalists think that international exchange visits will benefit teenagers at the school. To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
With the accelerating globalization and urbanization, more problems have been brought to our attention. It is universally acknowledged by scholars that youngsters will have been benificially afftected thanks to the global exchangers at their educational insitutions. I do believe that this situation’s advantages outweigh the drawbacks and this essay will fully explain my school of thought.
Some people have their own assumption that this kind of activities is a waste of time and an annoyance for students. This is because they have to spend at least a week to take a long journey to another country leading to the delay of completing their daily homework assignments. Take Vietnam National High School for the Gifted as an example, students have to complete multitasks of finishing their assignments at school and preparing for their exchanged trip on a daily basis. Althought it is believed that not organizing this kind of activities will prevent youngsters from wasting their time or being annoyed, I would strongly argue that they would receive huge advantages instead of those mentioned opinions.
Granted, students, who take part in exchanged trips, will enhance their knowledge and relationships. Spending time in acquiring knowledge and exchanging the cultural differences or national heritage is so worthy that every students should participate in global exchange visits. Moreover, an opportunity to meet foreigners, which results in the enhancement in communication skills or creating social relationships, is probably convenient comparing to the aforementioned disadvantages. Therefore, in stead of being involved in the people who are losing time or being annoyed, students will be completely appreciated for being more knowledgable and having more global friends.
In conclusion, I do believe that global exchange journeys are more beneficial since children can have a chance to gain knowledge and open their social relationships than being badly assumed as an annoyance or a waste of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-26 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- Some people think that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important f 56
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words You should sp 70
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
...forementioned disadvantages. Therefore, in stead of being involved in the people who are lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, at least, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55700325733 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17785457007 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57003257329 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4824403557 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.166666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137304727776 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571968085659 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474724629187 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905623369154 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042955164699 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.