Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
With the accelerating economic globalisation and urbanisation, more problems are brought to our attention and traffic is always the top-notch topic of all over the world. It is believed that we can increase the petrol’s price to reduce the traffic congestion and environmental problems. This essay will shed light on this notion and explain my viewpoint.
Initially, if the law of rising petrol’s price is carried out , people will lower the terms of using their private cars or motorbikes. Not only will the exhausting fumes from their transportations be lower considerably but also the noise in rush hour will not be able to exist. Therefore, we can particularly solve the air pollution and noise pollution. Besides, this will enhance people’s participation in using eco-friendly transportation such as bicycles or buses. This brings us so many magnificent advantages as long as we can do exercises, keep our body fit or enjoy fresh air.
In many countries, taking part in using public transportation has been one of their most important habits. In Vietnam, public transports have been improving from time to time and using that kind of transportation is a suitable solution beside increasing the price of petrol to reduce traffic jams or environment’s problems. In my opinion, travelling by bus will significantly create an unexpectable profits particularly for ourselves and generally for the Earth, which is our beautiful planet. For instance, a bus containing 50 persons will reduce the use of 50 private transportations and the proportion of exhausting fumes will witness a 50-time decrease. Moreover, paying 10 percent of using private car taxes is also a recommendation for this solution because this will make people lower the consumption of cars or motorcycles.
In conclusion, I strongly have the same viewpoint of upgrading the petrol’s price to gain the reduction of traffic problems and pollution. Besides, paying more attention to using public transportation and giving taxes to those private cars are effectively both the advantaged solutions for each of us and the environment.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 61
- Some people think that schools should invest more money in technology such as more computers while others think more money should be spent on teachers Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of rising petrol’s price is carried out , people will lower the terms of using th...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...traffic jams or environment’s problems. In my opinion, travelling by bus will sign...
^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'profit'?
Suggestion: profit
...ll significantly create an unexpectable profits particularly for ourselves and generall...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36746987952 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.259493822 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7545804489 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0960846341971 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384435539297 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404211418868 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705696010904 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247204166556 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.