Recreational drugs should be legalised and there should be no punishments for people who use them. To what extent do you agree?
Implementing policies that legalise the use of illicit substances is the most effective strategy and its users refrain from dealing with drug penalties. In my view, I partially accord with this issue to certain respects which I will elucidate in the subsequent paragraph.
On the one hand, taking any psychoactive compounds tends to disturb urban tranquillity, increasing the risk of societal disputes and traffic accidents due to wandering users on the streets. This impacts a significant surge in serious crime (murder and rape). As seen in Vancouver, the government decriminalises the possession of certain substance abuses in public, ultimately asking the federal government to reintroduce a ban on it. Moreover, enforcing drug law offences becomes essential to establish a deterrent effect on consumers. Seemingly, this might reduce the prevalence of drug dealers and those who have not been involved in, thereby mitigating the drugs-related casualties and fatalities.
On the other hand, drug legalisation assists the healthcare sector in treating deadly illnesses. Seemingly, this facilitates research and development of pharmaceuticals that can be safely used within medical frameworks. Ultimately, managing acute diseases can be issued to prescriptions for pharmacy purchases, not to mention the high cost of patented medicines in hospitals. In addition, the high mobility of individuals contributes to their long-term survival, prominently for those with heavy illnesses. Apparently, societies maintain regular depressants to confirm they remain in optimal health, enabling them to perform their activities effectively. It is evidence that certain components of marijuana (Cannabidiol) demonstrate efficacy in lessening the severe seizures in epilepsy patients.
Overall, from my perspective, allowing the consumption of harmful medicines would bring substantially advantageous aspects ranging from supporting medical industries to extending sufferers’ lifespan. This is provided that consumers do not interfere with the comfort of the wider community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
- Some people think we do not need museums any more in the modern world Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some think dangerous extreme sports such as skydiving and rock climbing should be banned To what extent do you agree 89
- Many today feel that attention spans are becoming shorter due to the prevalence of social media To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 100
- In many countries people are concerned about the number of children who are overweight What do you think are the causes of this What solution can you suggest 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ealing with drug penalties. In my view, I partially accord with this issue to cer...
^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...th this issue to certain respects which I will elucidate in the subsequent paragr...
^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eterrent effect on consumers. Seemingly, this might reduce the prevalence of drug...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, moreover, so, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01694915254 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26399666537 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681355932203 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0179536021 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125459444658 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356855612286 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355311634546 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625967353598 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385682843824 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.8 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ealing with drug penalties. In my view, I partially accord with this issue to cer...
^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...th this issue to certain respects which I will elucidate in the subsequent paragr...
^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eterrent effect on consumers. Seemingly, this might reduce the prevalence of drug...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, moreover, so, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01694915254 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26399666537 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681355932203 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0179536021 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125459444658 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356855612286 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355311634546 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625967353598 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385682843824 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.8 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.