The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of British students who could speak six distinct other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.
It is obvious that the percentage of three groups of languages increased, two groups declined, and the remained group leveled off. First no other language and French only decreased in 2010 and second German only group that did not change by 2010. Most of students liked to learn Spanish only.
As can be seen, the pupils have more tendency to learn another language in addition English. Hence, the rate of no other language decreased exactly 10 percent in 2010 to 10 percent. The German Only group did not change and leveled off in 2010 by 10 percent. Other four groups risen to 15, 20, 35, and 15 by only 5 percent from 10, 15, 30, and 10 in 2010. The undergraduates who have been taught Spanish language were more than others and this language has very appeal among them.
In conclusion, native student has liked to learn another language in that university. Not only did Spanish language has lots of fan for learning but also, another language group located in the second place that was increased in 2010. Although the students did not like to learn Frech only and its percentage was dropped the rate of no other language declined too and this means students have to spoke another language.
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The most important aim of science should to be improve people s lives To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The first chart be ow shows energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some university students want to learn other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the students') or simply say ''Most students''.
Suggestion: Most of the students; Most students
...only group that did not change by 2010. Most of students liked to learn Spanish only. As can be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'appealed'.
Suggestion: appealed
... than others and this language has very appeal among them. In conclusion, native stu...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fan seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of fans'.
Suggestion: lots of fans
...sity. Not only did Spanish language has lots of fan for learning but also, another language...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74786324786 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35969037195 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495726495726 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3282679955 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5833333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201489138593 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914817769229 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816008173703 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16658674059 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104034175533 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.