The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of British students who could speak six distinct other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.
It is obvious that the percentage of three groups increased, two groups declined, and the remained group has did not change. First no other language and French only decreased in 2010 and second German only group that did not change by 2010.
As can be seen, the pupils have more tendency to learn another tongue in addition to English. Hence, the rate of no other language decreased by exactly 10 percent in 2010 to 10 percent. The German-only group did not change and leveled off in 2010 by 10 percent. The other four groups rose to 15, 20, 35, and 15 by only 5 percent from 10, 15, 30, and 10 in 2010. The undergraduates who have been taught Spanish tongue were more than others and this language has very appeal among them.
In conclusion, native students have liked to learn another language in that university. Not only did the Spanish language have lots of fans for learning but also, another language group located in the second place that was increased in 2010.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- the graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predications for 2030 and 2040
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with prediction for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...ps declined, and the remained group has did not change. First no other language and...
^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ercent from 10, 15, 30, and 10 in 2010. The undergraduates who have been taught Spa...
^^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'appealed'.
Suggestion: appealed
... than others and this language has very appeal among them. In conclusion, native stu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70050761421 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38673703941 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532994923858 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5611481816 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188691593655 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889951530135 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900607682437 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150664146142 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113561889981 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.