The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same to periods.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The data depicts the total amount of Ashdown Museum's tourists before and after the year of being rennovated. Whereas the given pie chart provide information about the level of contentment of several guests during their visit within the two same years.
It is obvious that the number of visitors who visited this place during the year after refurbishment was more than before, while the percentage of dissatisfied and satisfied in order had the highest percent year before and year after recreate. The no-response group did not change during this time.
As can be seen, by increasing the visitors to around 18000 after recreate shown people have more tendency to visit this place after refurbishment and pie charts shown this exactly. The percentage of people who were dissatisfied decreased from 25 after recreating to 15 percent and the satisfied group by increasing 10 percent showed this issue. In addition, the very satisfied group has risen 20 percent from 15 to 35 and very dissatisfied declined to 5 percent. The no-response group has no change during these years.
In conclusion, people in society have been satisfied with the refurbishment of the Ashdown Museum and the number of them increased after recreating.
- It is important for everyone including young people to save money for their future To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 67
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15577889447 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71960987492 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4724340052 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330183764068 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127599556605 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867644686101 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20907363063 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649890009318 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.