The maps below shown an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates the current area in the town of Norbition and its development plan in the future.
It is obvious that the main square will not change in the new design but add some new path ways to this place. All of the factories replaced with housings and in the middle of the town get crowd in the future plan.
As can be seen, there is not any change in the border of the city and its wide do not change. In the developed plan there is not any factory and all of them omitted but a school, playground, medical center, and shops add in new version of town which to lasted facilities are near the middle square. Although the middle center doesn’t change three new paths add that end to this place and one of them pass the river in the farmland which located a housing there and another way leads to school. The last way link to a small squire that add below the origin squire in the planned future development. Six housing areas constructed around the town.
In conclusion, the new plan of the town has more facilities and path ways that seems it is better than before scheme.
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research that 61
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discus both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...t add some new path ways to this place. All of the factories replaced with housings and in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36945812808 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22490017433 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2341161492 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148990290165 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751400363495 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610772638111 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113579322385 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560342046784 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.