The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrates the modifications in the percentage of energy produced from distinctive sources in a1985 and 2003.
Overall, in 1985 oil was the most used source of energy production, followed by nuclear, natural gas and lastly coal. By 2003, the proportion of energy produced from oil declined remarkably but was still the most used, hydro remained unchanged while the percentage of energy produced from natural gas and coal witnessed an upward trend.
In 1985, the proportion of energy processed from oil occupied over a half of the total, though it had declined to 39% by 2003. Similarly, nuclear was also the second most common sources of energy with the figure being recorded at 22% and plummeted to 8% over the next 18 years.
On the contrary, the starting point of coal and natural gas was lower with 8% and 13% respectively which would increased to the nearly identical figure (22% and 23%). Energy produced from hydro accounted for 4% in 1985 and remained unchanged in 1985, while other renewable energy was not a popular source of energy (1%) in 2003 and rose to 4% in 2003
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | view | |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays a large amount of advertising aimed at children should be banned because of the negative effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, second, similarly, so, still, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86243386243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55886713477 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.9749441057 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955212625914 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560536803889 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463122880258 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793780290584 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410727116783 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.