tpo 35
The reading and the lecture give information about the Antartica. While the reading suggest three argument to support that Antartica was as much wormer than it is today to the point that could support rich ecosystem and divers plant life, the lecture indicated that all the three theories illustrated in the reading passage are not convincing.
First,The lecture mentions that the source of pollen grain are not from antarctica trees origin. He exeplains that due to it light weight, they are possibly carried by wind and ocean from warmer area in Africa and south America to Atractica coastlines. That disagrees with what the reading indicates.
Second, contrary to what belief in the reading, the lectuer says that despite the volcanic activities, scientists found that the carbon dioxide level was not high in the atmosphere at the Middle Miocene era as the reading mentions. In fact, their finding reveals that carbon dioxide level was less than it is today.
Finally, The high level of deuterium found in the remains of plants does not essentially indicates the amount of rainfall in the Middle Miocene. The professor emphasizes that different plants type have different absorption capacity to deuterium. Perhaps the plants grow during the Middle miocene era keept a high amount of deuterium. This contrast with the reading theory that indicates that the plants absorbed larg amount of deterium due to an increase in a rainfall, which support the warmer climet theory at that era.
- tpo 8 the Chevalier's memoir is accurate or not 73
- using the fuel-cell engine to power cars instead of the internal-combustion engine 76
- tpo 40 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 72
- young people in the past were more dependent on their parents to make decisions, however, they are able to make decisions about their own lives 90
suggest three argument to support
suggest three arguments to support
the source of pollen grain are not
the sources of pollen grain are not
contrary to what belief in the reading,
contrary to the belief in the reading,
contrary to what believed in the reading,
does not essentially indicates
does not essentially indicate
different plants type have different absorption capacity to deuterium.
different plant types have different absorption capacities to deuterium.
This contrast with the reading
This contrasts with the reading
Sentence: While the reading suggest three argument to support that Antartica was as much wormer than it is today to the point that could support rich ecosystem and divers plant life, the lecture indicated that all the three theories illustrated in the reading passage are not convincing.
Error: wormer Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: First,The lecture mentions that the source of pollen grain are not from antarctica trees origin.
Error: antarctica Suggestion: antarctic
Sentence: He exeplains that due to it light weight, they are possibly carried by wind and ocean from warmer area in Africa and south America to Atractica coastlines.
Error: exeplains Suggestion: explains
Sentence: Second, contrary to what belief in the reading, the lectuer says that despite the volcanic activities, scientists found that the carbon dioxide level was not high in the atmosphere at the Middle Miocene era as the reading mentions.
Error: lectuer Suggestion: lecture
Sentence: Perhaps the plants grow during the Middle miocene era keept a high amount of deuterium.
Error: miocene Suggestion: mine
Error: keept Suggestion: keep
Sentence: This contrast with the reading theory that indicates that the plants absorbed larg amount of deterium due to an increase in a rainfall, which support the warmer climet theory at that era.
Error: deterium Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: larg Suggestion: large
Error: climet Suggestion: clime
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 243 250
No. of Characters: 1221 1200
No. of Different Words: 129 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.948 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.025 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.395 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.091 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.851 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.382 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.637 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.133 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4