Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
With modernization, modernized gadgets have made people's life luxurious. People has developed such gadgets and technologies to ease their life and to make life more luxurious. Hence yes, definitely the ease of making food has altered, in fact, improved the living standard of people. Today in this fast growing society, time is money, therefore the ease of preparing food has saved a lot of time to be used in a more productive approach. This reduction in time requirement has also helped decrease the worries among the people about preparing food in their busy lives. This ease of preparing food has also helped people to be healthy since the cook need not to inhale the harmful gasses for a longer duration. These above-mentioned points add up to a unified motive, happiness, with a better health and more time to spend with family and friends.
First of all people in this modernized society need time, which is hard to find. This easiness in preparing food has helped to conserve time to be used productively. From a reversed direction this ease has also helped the society to develop in a more faster way.
The reduction in time requirement has lessen the worries among people, with the increasing competition and development, diseases such as hypertension etc. are gaining domination. In this domain also the small approach in time reduction in cooking can be considered a cure.
The time reduction in cooking has also helped one to be healthy since the lessening the time has also minimised the exposure to those harmful gases. Leading to serious respiratory diseases. In developing countries like India, some housewives from the countryside uses firewood for cooking, and it was found that while making food, in a day, they inhale smoke equivalent to four hundred cigarettes. This health deteriorating hazard in those areas can be stopped with the use of modernized gadgets that uses LPG and electricity.
The time savior has decreased worries has ultimately improved the way people live, it has provided people more time to spend effectively and has also saved time to spend with family and friend leading to decreased worries. The lessening worries had led to the decrease of mental diseases. Happiness achieved due to the above-mentioned reason has helped people to live longer and a healthy life.
- What most human beings really want to attain is not knowledge, but certainty. Gaining real knowledge requires taking risks and keeping the mind open—but most people prefer to be reassured rather than to learn the complex and often unsettling truth about 75
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but morecomplex and more mysterious. 16
- People who pursue their own intellectual interests for purely personal reasons are more likely to benefit the rest of the world than are people who try to act for the public good 50
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...r life and to make life more luxurious. Hence yes, definitely the ease of making food...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 659, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'inhale'?
Suggestion: inhale
...e to be healthy since the cook need not to inhale the harmful gasses for a longer duratio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...also helped the society to develop in a more faster way. The reduction in time requirem...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'lessened'.
Suggestion: lessened
... The reduction in time requirement has lessen the worries among people, with the incr...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'in fact', 'such as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.277511961722 0.240241500013 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.200956937799 0.157235817809 128% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0765550239234 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0406698564593 0.0497285424764 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.011961722488 0.0444667217837 27% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.102870813397 0.12292977631 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0933014354067 0.0406280797675 230% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.77071332586 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0502392344498 0.030933414821 162% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.11004784689 0.0997080785238 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00717703349282 0.0249443105267 29% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00478468899522 0.0148568991511 32% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2320.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 382.0 452.878318584 84% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07329842932 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.366492146597 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.264397905759 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188481675393 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138743455497 0.132149295362 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77071332586 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 219.290929204 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465968586387 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 49.2018956945 55.4138127331 89% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.1 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5718797248 59.4972553346 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 45.5397905759 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.8679245283 1.64882698954 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36304383999 0.391690518653 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.126358957605 0.123202303941 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0966770570835 0.077325440228 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.531670021448 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183630725779 0.149214159877 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149680446628 0.161403998019 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968446813318 0.0892212321368 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.401091847279 0.385218514788 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.101841118603 0.0692045440612 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260677097046 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826666112719 0.0653680567796 126% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.