Tpo 21
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about merits and demerits have to with "modified trees". Considering this, the author offers three advantages of modified trees. The professor, on the other hand, not only refutes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the ways that the reading just argued. The lecturer demonstrates three reasons to reject the options in the reading.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that modified trees can be more resistant that nature trees. As stated by the professor, there some species of trees, which are resistant in various situations. For example, if the climate alters, they can be survived. However, modified trees are designed to resist in particular areas. Therefore, if any difference occurs in the area like rainfall change, all the modified trees will be wiped out. So, it is a fallacious conclusion that the modified trees are harder.
Moreover, unlike the passage which claims that modified trees bring farmers about economic privileges, due to growing faster, giving greater food, which give farmers a chance to save their money. The professor illustrates that there are hidden cost associated with modified trees so that farmers should pay companies which have designed these trees, whenever they want to plant modified trees. Hence, it is not economical.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the passage that modified trees preserve natural trees due to the fact that modified trees satisfy the demand for natural trees, saying that modified trees damage natural trees owing to the fact that they grow aggressively, and they compete with wild trees for resources such as water.
All in all, the professor maintains that even though modified trees have many merits, the demerits of it outweigh its merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to reject the options in the reading. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the demerits of it outweigh its merits.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in particular', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233727810651 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.174556213018 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0739644970414 0.0723426182421 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0502958579882 0.0435111971325 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0266272189349 0.0277247811725 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121301775148 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0502958579882 0.0370669169778 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.45966574062 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0266272189349 0.0208969081088 127% => OK
Particles: 0.00295857988166 0.00154638098197 191% => OK
Determiners: 0.115384615385 0.128158765124 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0118343195266 0.0158828679856 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0207100591716 0.0114777025283 180% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1859.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 300.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19666666667 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.406666666667 0.374372842146 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.303333333333 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186666666667 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0966666666667 0.113142543107 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45966574062 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543333333333 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.133788345 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2486513158 49.3711431718 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.933333333 132.220823453 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.7502111507 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 50.3333333333 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.61176470588 1.90840788429 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.573779149731 0.549887131256 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0943049738562 0.142949733639 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0772431501147 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.62388485159 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.225762414061 0.139662658121 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256033997056 0.266732575781 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100694476487 0.103435571967 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.39066124716 0.414875509568 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0734322026006 0.0530846634433 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3874895034 0.40443939384 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891568467446 0.0528353158467 169% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.