The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Environmental degradation has become a serious concern for the past few decades. The effects of polluting nature can be seen in all major cities and towns around the globe. Even though, Customer waste has been found to be one of the major culprits, there hasn’t been much action taken to address this issue. Some people believe that imposing restriction on customer generated waste collection would be a permanent fix for this problem. Though this idea helps in reducing garbage at dumping grounds it wouldn’t be helpful in eliminating or mitigating this issue.
Firstly, keeping restriction on trash collection will make people think of other unhealthy disposing alternatives like burning the excess garbage in the open air or dumping it in their backyards lead to polluting surrounding environment and exacerbating the issue.
Secondly, garbage collection process is not universally available. When it comes to developing countries like India, Pakistan, and Nepal, where home-owners manually dump their waste at garbage yards, it won’t be possible to measure and limit the size of garbage that has to be disposed.
Thirdly, not all consumer waste can be deemed hazardous. Major environmental problems are due lack proper disposable techniques for extensively used non – degradable material like plastic, chemicals, and other packing materials. This cannot be addressed by limiting amount of trash collection.
Adding to this, some liquid waste and sprays used for cleaning, and removing pest, which are highly dangerous are released directly into atmosphere from the households making it impossible to check and limit their collection.
Finally, after considering above examples, it can be concluded that limiting the amount of garbage collection cannot make much impact in mitigation environmental issues. Government should invest some time and resource in improving recycling and disposing techniques, and also in creating public awareness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- 2. Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your o 58
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 75
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243401759531 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.202346041056 0.157235817809 129% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0879765395894 0.0880659088768 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0469208211144 0.0497285424764 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0263929618768 0.0444667217837 59% => OK
Prepositions: 0.102639296188 0.12292977631 83% => OK
Participles: 0.108504398827 0.0406280797675 267% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.92837985944 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0234604105572 0.030933414821 76% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0674486803519 0.0997080785238 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0234604105572 0.0249443105267 94% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0117302052786 0.0148568991511 79% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1971.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 296.0 452.878318584 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.65878378378 6.0361032391 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.58838876751 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.456081081081 0.366273622748 125% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.351351351351 0.280924506359 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.277027027027 0.200843997647 138% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.202702702703 0.132149295362 153% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92837985944 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618243243243 0.48968727796 126% => OK
Word variations: 70.1429352728 55.4138127331 127% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 21.1428571429 23.380412469 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3416795431 59.4972553346 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.785714286 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 23.380412469 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.674092028746 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 56.277992278 51.4728631049 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.64893617021 1.64882698954 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314817314055 0.391690518653 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0661204354254 0.123202303941 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0495768398942 0.077325440228 64% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.573918658641 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.228013409922 0.149214159877 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111945918602 0.161403998019 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662836129232 0.0892212321368 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.171188991386 0.385218514788 44% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0496921563689 0.0692045440612 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174524689536 0.275328986314 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445995355846 0.0653680567796 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.