All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The statement asserted is partially true as companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently because they don't listen to their employees and want to inhabit the methods that other companies use to work more efficiently. But, the main problem is that doing this just make the employees a bit nervous. Since, if in a company you are not able to express your own thoughts it would be like am I being listened or I am just a cog in a wheel? As, people really need to feel being wanted.
As, Simon has quoted "Customers will never love a company until the employees love it first." Admittedly, it is quite true that if there is no space for the employees to express their feeling and views they would never think of betterment of company. So, there should be a free-style of working that allows employees to express themselves. Moreover, it is equally true that happy is your employee, happy are your customers and successful is your company. However, the companies which do not listen to the ideas and don't have free-style of listening to employees eventually end up looking for the consultants for their company to run more efficiently. However, this just leads to proliferation of money as if companies team would have spent more time listening to their own employees about the methods and measures that could be taken for proper flow of the company the consultants would have been not required and even the employers would be happy as they are being listened and are allowed to think for the betterment of companies. So, it would be beneficial for their motivation and the way they would treat their company. Perhaps, sometimes it is necessary to even call the consultants in companies to boost up the level of employee as the consultants would express their ideas to them and they would be able to look into them and work accordingly.
Nevertheless, if the companies treat employees like they are wanted and make a difference to the company they will surely work hard and do good things that are beneficiary for companies and this would just mean that they can express their ideas and the need for consultants required would be less.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a newletter offering advice to investors:Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed satellite tec 50
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 50
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 43
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o operate more efficiently because they dont listen to their employees and want to i...
^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...nhabit the methods that other companies use to work more efficiently. But, the main...
^^^
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...listened or I am just a cog in a wheel? As, people really need to feel being wante...
^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...es which do not listen to the ideas and dont have free-style of listening to employe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had spent'?
Suggestion: had spent
...iferation of money as if companies team would have spent more time listening to their own employ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'really', 'so', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.166259168704 0.240241500013 69% => OK
Verbs: 0.21271393643 0.157235817809 135% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0586797066015 0.0880659088768 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0831295843521 0.0497285424764 167% => OK
Pronouns: 0.078239608802 0.0444667217837 176% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.102689486553 0.12292977631 84% => OK
Participles: 0.041564792176 0.0406280797675 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7075579027 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0488997555012 0.030933414821 158% => OK
Particles: 0.00488997555012 0.0016655270985 294% => OK
Determiners: 0.0831295843521 0.0997080785238 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.039119804401 0.0249443105267 157% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00733496332518 0.0148568991511 49% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2198.0 2732.02544248 80% => OK
No of words: 378.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81481481481 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.277777777778 0.366273622748 76% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.243386243386 0.280924506359 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177248677249 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137566137566 0.132149295362 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7075579027 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 219.290929204 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420634920635 0.48968727796 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.5737496488 55.4138127331 79% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 31.5 23.380412469 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.875714234 59.4972553346 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.166666667 141.124799967 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 23.380412469 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.674092028746 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 55.8386243386 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 0.830065359477 1.64882698954 50% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472041448871 0.391690518653 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.157828188816 0.123202303941 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.132694459474 0.077325440228 172% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.557989150472 0.547984918172 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.214273233984 0.149214159877 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222871743602 0.161403998019 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159708030055 0.0892212321368 179% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.552610532922 0.385218514788 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0215531934525 0.0692045440612 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.374130352812 0.275328986314 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113528712444 0.0653680567796 174% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.