Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Since pre-history, alternative medicines have used widely to cure people. Even nowadays, alternative medicines are used by many people around the world. However, some people claimed that, the use of such medicine should be limited due to the lack of scientific evidences for its effectiveness and dangers. Therefore, the optimum level for this issue can be solved by use both as complementary.
Despite the long history of its use, the knowledge of alternative medicine is limited. There are many parts unknown and that could cause side effects even though there are no artificial substances. Since the alternative medicine's effectiveness has not discovered, including whether this medicine can cure all the diseases, it cannot be able to use in all practices. Therefore, the natural medicine cannot be cured fully of all diseases and this only can be used as an additional substance rather than to cure diseases.
However, natural medicines can have several advantages. First and foremost, alternative medicines usually can perform with diverse methods such as massages, therapy and aroma. All those methods of using alternative medicines usually do not have harmful to health. The most advantageous part for such aromatherapy and homeopathy of natural medicine, is the cheaper cost than modern medicines and which can be acquired from every pharmaceutical stores. The natural medicines can be used for daily lives, while modern medicine can be used for any emergencies.
In conclusion, the natural medicine could be acquired easily by most of people without paying expensive prices. The optimum method would be the complementary of both medicines. The natural medicines would not worry about its effect, whereas the modern medicine would save its cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Sai sushma | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | Hira Shaheen | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | tontan53251@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Rihav Raj Acharya | 56 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. 78
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 73
- The bar chart shows the import and export of Canada (values in $) from 1991 to 1995. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2006 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 67
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibilities of governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'medicines'' or 'medicine's'?
Suggestion: medicines'; medicine's
...icial substances. Since the alternative medicines effectiveness has not discovered, inclu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...al medicine could be acquired easily by most of people without paying expensive prices. The op...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217532467532 0.247107183377 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.142857142857 0.155533422707 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12987012987 0.0946595960268 137% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0616883116883 0.0501214627716 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0162337662338 0.0437548338989 37% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12012987013 0.122226691241 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0487012987013 0.0403226058552 121% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87921741251 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0162337662338 0.0326793684256 50% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0974025974026 0.0861772015684 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0519480519481 0.021408717616 243% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00324675324675 0.011925033212 27% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1755.0 1933.35771543 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 316.048096192 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.40510948905 6.12580529183 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.412408759124 0.374742101984 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.339416058394 0.28420135186 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.222627737226 0.203846283523 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.171532846715 0.137316102897 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87921741251 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.037074148 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.56093040696 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.7321640556 60.7387585426 85% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.125 20.7743622355 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9357550349 49.517814964 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6875 127.492653851 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7743622355 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5625 0.814263465372 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 51.0666058394 49.1944974215 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.75 1.69124875643 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283846407917 0.332605444948 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133532870462 0.102741220458 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.101331914867 0.0668466124924 152% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.524067812669 0.534860350844 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118910716574 0.148594505496 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118446829498 0.134430193775 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578836170656 0.0742795772207 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.345171733578 0.324371583561 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0553703010324 0.0638462369009 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20075365534 0.228012699653 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477153968956 0.058150111329 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 1.9629258517 255% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.